President Donald Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship through executive order has faced continuous legal challenges throughout 2025, with federal courts repeatedly blocking its implementation. The controversial order, signed on Trump’s first day back in office, has sparked a constitutional battle that continues to unfold.
Table of Contents
What Is the Birthright Citizenship Executive Order?
On his first day back in the White House, Trump signed an executive order to end automatic citizenship for the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and foreign workers and visitors. The order targets children born in the United States whose parents are either in the country illegally or temporarily on work visas.
The executive order challenges the traditional interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has historically granted citizenship to nearly all children born on U.S. soil. “The executive order flagrantly violates the 14th Amendment citizenship clause and Section 1401a of the Immigration and Nationality Act,” Powell said, “both of which guarantee birthright citizenship to nearly all children born in the United States, with only narrow exceptions for ambassadors” and diplomatic personnel.
Timeline of Court Blocks in 2025
Initial Blocks (January-February 2025)
Multiple federal courts moved quickly to block the executive order after its signing in January 2025. Three federal judges — both conservative and liberal — have since ruled the order unconstitutional, blocking it from taking effect.
Supreme Court Intervention (June 2025)
The legal landscape shifted in late June when the Supreme Court issued a limited ruling on the case. The decision issues some limits on the power of federal judges to universally block President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, asking lower courts to reconsider their rulings.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday gave President Donald Trump a partial victory on one of his most far-reaching executive orders, ending birthright citizenship. The court’s opinion limits so-called nationwide injunctions imposed by federal courts.
Current Status (July 2025)
Despite the Supreme Court’s procedural ruling, legal challenges continue. A federal judge agreed Thursday to issue a new nationwide block against President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship. This demonstrates that courts are still finding ways to halt the order’s implementation.
Impact of Supreme Court’s Limited Ruling
The Supreme Court’s June 2025 decision was primarily procedural, focusing on limiting nationwide injunctions rather than addressing the constitutionality of the executive order itself. The Supreme Court has stated, however, that the Trump administration is not to apply the executive order against anyone for at least 30 days following June 27, 2025.
This 30-day moratorium has provided advocates additional time to seek new legal remedies. Even without any further relief, the government cannot apply the EO to deny any child their birthright citizenship for the next 30 days. It can, however, begin to develop and issue guidance about how the executive branch will implement the EO.
What This Means for Affected Families
The ongoing legal battles have created uncertainty for families with children born in the United States. The preliminary injunction preserves the status quo until final judgement. As a result, the executive order has indefinitely been blocked until these cases are adjudicated.
For now, children born in the United States continue to receive citizenship documentation as they have historically, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. However, the administration has begun developing implementation guidance for when the order might eventually take effect.
Constitutional Questions at the Heart of the Debate
The legal challenges center on fundamental questions about the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause. The Trump administration argues that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders from birthright citizenship.
Critics contend this interpretation contradicts over 150 years of legal precedent established after the Civil War. The 14th Amendment was originally adopted to ensure citizenship for freed enslaved people and their descendants, establishing a broad principle of birthright citizenship.
What’s Next for the Legal Battle
As of July 2025, the legal fight continues on multiple fronts. Advocacy groups and civil rights organizations are pursuing new nationwide class-action lawsuits to permanently block the executive order. We and other advocates are again seeking to block the executive order on a national basis, through nationwide class-action claims, according to legal advocates.
The ultimate resolution may require a definitive Supreme Court ruling on the constitutional merits of the case, rather than just procedural questions about injunctions. Until then, the status quo remains in place, with birthright citizenship continuing for all children born in the United States.
Conclusion
The battle over Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order represents one of the most significant constitutional challenges of 2025. While the Supreme Court’s June ruling limited some judicial tools for blocking the order, federal judges continue to find ways to prevent its implementation. The ongoing legal uncertainty highlights the complex intersection of immigration law, constitutional interpretation, and executive power in modern America.
As this story continues to develop, affected families and legal observers will be watching closely for the next developments in what has become a defining legal battle of the Trump presidency’s second term.