The key phrase “candace owens brigitte macron” has dominated headlines today as French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron filed a high-profile defamation lawsuit in the United States against political commentator Candace Owens. The case, launched in Delaware on July 23, 2025, has stirred global attention due to its international legal implications, the stature of the parties involved, and ongoing debates about disinformation and celebrity accountability.
Table of Contents
Background: The Case Against Candace Owens
Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron’s lawsuit fiercely challenges repeated allegations made by Candace Owens. The suit alleges that Owens waged a public campaign across her social media platforms and a multi-part podcast series, falsely claiming that Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman and that she has assumed a false identity. These claims were promoted on Owens’ podcast and various social channels throughout the year.
According to the legal filing, the Macrons assert that these statements are “demonstrably false.” They accuse Owens of disseminating these allegations knowingly, with the intent to boost her personal brand and audience. The suit describes the impact as “relentless bullying on a worldwide scale,” degrading and dehumanizing the French First Family.
Key Points Summary
- Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron sued Candace Owens for defamation in Delaware on July 23, 2025.
- The lawsuit targets false claims that Brigitte Macron was born male and assumed a new identity.
- The Macrons allege a deliberate misinformation campaign by Owens for profit and notoriety.
- U.S. defamation law requires the plaintiffs (as public figures) to prove “actual malice.”
Candace Owens Brigitte Macron: A Legal First for France
For the first time, President Macron and Brigitte have personally filed a lawsuit in the United States to combat cross-border misinformation. The action names not only Owens but also her business entities registered in Delaware, adding complexity to the proceedings.
Owens has not issued a formal response at the time of writing, but her spokesperson indicated her intention to address the controversy on her podcast this week.
The Macrons seek compensatory and punitive damages for emotional distress and reputational harm. Though specific sums are not disclosed, the lawsuit’s language points to severe emotional and social consequences. Every public appearance by the Macrons is now overshadowed by viral misinformation, which the lawsuit calls “intrusive, dehumanizing, and profoundly unfair”.
Read Also-Macron Candace Owens: French President Takes Legal Action Amid Controversy
Recent Developments and Context
Earlier this month, Brigitte Macron advanced a related libel case in France’s highest appeals court. A previous French judgment had awarded her damages from local parties spreading the same falsehoods, but that verdict was overturned last week, intensifying the Macrons’ legal push.
Meanwhile, Owens’ podcast and online content—reportedly an eight-part series titled “Becoming Brigitte”—has been criticized for targeting the couple’s marriage, background, and even suggesting conspiracy theories about President Macron’s career and sexuality. The lawsuit emphasizes that these claims are not only fake but are calculated attempts to “promote known conspiracy theorists and defamers.”
Table: Timeline of Recent Events
Public Reactions and International Implications
The lawsuit stands out as a rare example of a sitting world leader taking legal action in a foreign jurisdiction. Similar moves, like former U.S. President Trump’s defamation filings, highlight shifting global dynamics in holding influencers and public figures to account for cross-border misinformation.
Legal experts note that winning such a case in the U.S. will require the Macrons to prove that Owens acted with “actual malice,” meaning she knew the statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. This high legal standard sets the stage for an intense and closely watched court battle.
Final Thoughts
As the candace owens brigitte macron lawsuit unfolds, its outcome may reshape the legal landscape for global figures seeking justice against digital age defamation. Readers are encouraged to follow developments and share their thoughts on this headline-making story in the comments below.