The Eric Adams party story is one of the most dramatic developments in recent New York politics. Mayor Eric Adams, once seen as a rising figure in Democratic circles, took an extraordinary step in 2025 by abandoning the party that helped elect him and attempting to forge his own independent path. His creation of the “Safe & Affordable” ballot line symbolized his bold gamble to hold onto power. But just months later, the experiment came crashing down, leaving his political future uncertain and the city’s mayoral race transformed.
On September 28, 2025, Adams officially withdrew from the race for re-election. Although his name remains on the November ballot, his campaign is effectively over. The rise and fall of the Eric Adams party has become a case study in political risk-taking, party loyalty, and the challenges of independence in a city dominated by Democrats.
Table of Contents
Eric Adams Walks Away from the Democratic Party
When Eric Adams announced in April 2025 that he would not participate in the Democratic primary, political observers were stunned. No sitting mayor in modern New York history had attempted to bypass the city’s dominant party and run independently.
Adams framed his decision as a response to what he called “unfair attacks” and “constant speculation” about federal investigations into his fundraising practices. By leaving the primary behind, he claimed he could focus on issues like public safety, housing affordability, and combating antisemitism without being distracted by party infighting.
Yet, the move was interpreted by many as an act of desperation. His approval ratings had fallen, his relationship with Democratic leaders was strained, and his standing in the polls suggested he could face defeat in a head-to-head primary contest.
The Eric Adams party was born out of this context—an effort to rebrand himself as a mayor who stood above partisan politics.
The “Safe & Affordable” Ballot Line
To formalize his independent candidacy, Adams launched a ballot line called “Safe & Affordable.” The name captured two of his administration’s central themes:
- Safety: Adams, a former NYPD officer, consistently framed himself as a law-and-order mayor who prioritized public security.
- Affordability: With New Yorkers facing rising rents and housing shortages, he sought to position himself as an advocate for working-class families.
At one stage, Adams also filed for another independent line called “EndAntiSemitism.” But state election law only allows one custom line, forcing him to choose. “Safe & Affordable” ultimately became his official banner for the November 2025 ballot.
This ballot line was designed to serve as more than just a legal mechanism—it was an attempt to create a new political identity. Supporters called it a brave step. Critics dismissed it as shallow branding that lacked real ideological foundation.
The Political Fallout
Adams’s break from the Democratic Party triggered a wave of political consequences that weakened his campaign almost immediately:
Loss of Democratic Support
Party leaders who had once backed Adams quickly abandoned him. The city’s Democratic establishment rallied around his opponents, leaving him isolated.
Collapse of Fundraising
The New York City Campaign Finance Board denied Adams access to matching funds, citing his failure to qualify through the Democratic primary. Without those millions in public dollars, his campaign coffers quickly dried up.
Confusion Among Voters
While the Eric Adams party was meant to simplify his message, many New Yorkers were unsure of what “Safe & Affordable” actually represented. Polls showed that voters associated Adams more with controversy than with policy solutions.
Perceptions of Opportunism
Critics accused Adams of abandoning the Democratic Party not out of principle but out of self-preservation. The shift fueled narratives that his campaign was about personal power rather than public service.
Campaign Struggles Through 2025
The months that followed Adams’s announcement were marked by mounting struggles:
- Federal prosecutors continued their investigation into his campaign fundraising practices, overshadowing his public appearances.
- Media outlets published story after story about his legal troubles, further damaging his credibility.
- Polls consistently placed him behind Democratic challenger Zohran Mamdani and independent rival Andrew Cuomo.
Even when Adams attempted to hold rallies under the Eric Adams party banner, turnout was low compared to the packed events of his opponents. Without party machinery or grassroots support, his campaign lacked the energy to gain traction.
The Decision to Withdraw
On September 28, 2025, Adams released a video statement announcing his withdrawal from the race. His reasons were clear:
- Media Pressure: He cited “constant media speculation” about ongoing investigations as a distraction that made it impossible to focus on the campaign.
- Financial Barriers: The denial of matching funds left him without the resources to compete effectively.
- Political Realities: With shrinking support and rising opposition, his path to victory had effectively closed.
Although Adams’s name will still appear on the ballot under the “Safe & Affordable” line, his announcement confirmed that he is no longer seeking re-election. His term as mayor will end in January 2026, closing the book on one of the most turbulent mayoralties in recent memory.
The New Political Landscape
With Adams out of the race, the November 2025 mayoral election has shifted dramatically. The leading candidates now include:
- Zohran Mamdani (Democrat): The Democratic nominee, representing a progressive shift in city politics.
- Andrew Cuomo (Independent): Running under the “Fight and Deliver” ballot line, Cuomo presents himself as a centrist alternative.
- Curtis Sliwa (Republican): The conservative activist, though unlikely to win in a heavily Democratic city, remains a vocal presence in the race.
Adams’s departure has cleared the way for new debates about the city’s future, particularly on issues of housing, safety, and governance.
The Legacy of the Eric Adams Party
Even though the Eric Adams party lasted only a few months, its impact will be studied for years to come.
A Warning Against Breaking from the Party
Adams’s experience shows how difficult it is to survive politically in New York without the support of the Democratic Party. Independent runs rarely succeed in a city where Democratic loyalty runs deep.
Branding Alone Is Not Enough
The “Safe & Affordable” ballot line failed to resonate because it lacked substance. Voters demand more than slogans—they expect policies, credibility, and trust.
Independent Politics Require Strong Infrastructure
Launching a new political identity requires money, staff, and grassroots support. Adams had none of these, making his effort unsustainable from the start.
What the Future Holds for Eric Adams
As Adams finishes his final months in office, speculation about his next steps is already growing. Some questions remain unanswered:
- Will the federal investigation lead to formal charges?
- Could Adams attempt a comeback in another role, perhaps outside of electoral politics?
- How will New Yorkers remember his time in City Hall—by his achievements or by the collapse of the Eric Adams party?
For now, Adams remains mayor, but his influence on the city’s political future is diminished.
Final Thoughts
The Eric Adams party began as a bold experiment—a sitting mayor rejecting the Democratic establishment and attempting to create a new political movement. But within months, it collapsed under the weight of legal troubles, financial shortfalls, and voter skepticism.
His withdrawal from the 2025 race marks the end of a turbulent chapter in New York politics and serves as a reminder that independence, while appealing in theory, is extraordinarily difficult in practice.
Do you believe Adams made the right choice to break from the Democrats, or did that decision doom his re-election bid from the start? Share your thoughts in the comments below and join the conversation.