If you’re wondering how to watch Diddy sentencing, there are clear steps and confirmed details on how the high-profile courtroom event unfolded. Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced on October 3, 2025, to four years and two months in federal prison, marking one of the most widely followed celebrity legal cases in recent years. The sentencing hearing attracted intense national attention, with major TV networks, reporters, and legal observers covering every moment.
Table of Contents
Why People Want to Watch the Diddy Sentencing
Diddy’s case has dominated headlines throughout 2025. After being found guilty on two federal charges related to transporting individuals for prostitution, his sentencing hearing became a focal point for both legal analysts and the public. Many wanted to follow the proceedings in real time to hear the judge’s reasoning, the defense’s final arguments, and Diddy’s own statement to the court.
However, like most federal cases, the courtroom did not allow direct live video coverage. That means the only way to follow the hearing was through news broadcasts, streaming platforms, or in-person court access for approved attendees.
Key Details: Date, Time, and Location
- Date: Friday, October 3, 2025
- Time: 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
- Location: United States District Court, New York
The hearing took place in a federal courtroom with extremely limited seating. Overflow rooms were set up for journalists, legal professionals, and additional observers to watch the proceedings via closed-circuit monitors.
How to Watch Diddy Sentencing — Step-by-Step
Because live courtroom streaming was not allowed, here’s exactly how viewers were able to follow the sentencing:
- Tune in to Major News Networks
National broadcasters like ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and major cable news channels aired live segments from outside the courthouse and provided updates as they came in. Many had legal correspondents reporting from inside the courtroom or the overflow rooms. - Use Official Network Apps and Websites
Viewers who did not have cable could watch via the networks’ official apps or websites. These platforms provided live coverage, commentary, and recaps as the sentencing unfolded. - Follow Live Updates from Court Reporters
Accredited journalists inside the courtroom shared minute-by-minute written updates, including statements from the judge and defense team. These were relayed through live blogs and special broadcast segments. - Watch Local Affiliate Broadcasts
Local ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX stations also covered the sentencing, offering regional coverage and interviews with legal experts, attorneys, and members of the public gathered outside the courthouse. - Check for Post-Hearing Video Releases
After the sentencing concluded, major networks released video clips showing key moments, including statements outside the courthouse and press conferences from Diddy’s legal team.
What Happened During the Sentencing
During the hearing, prosecutors pushed for a sentence of over 11 years, citing the severity of the crimes. The defense requested just over one year, arguing for leniency and highlighting Diddy’s community contributions.
Judge Arun Subramanian ultimately imposed a 50-month sentence (4 years and 2 months), citing the gravity of the offenses and Diddy’s influence. He also issued a $500,000 fine and ordered five years of supervised release after his prison term.
Before the sentence was read, the defense played a 12-minute video showcasing Diddy’s family life and charitable work. Diddy also delivered a personal statement expressing remorse but maintaining that some allegations were exaggerated.
Because he had already spent about one year in custody, that time will count toward his sentence, meaning he has roughly three years left to serve.
Why There Was No Direct Courtroom Feed
Many viewers expected to see the sentencing live, but several factors prevented this:
- Federal court policy: Most federal courtrooms do not allow live video or audio feeds during hearings.
- Security and privacy concerns: Due to the high-profile nature of the case, strict access limits were in place to ensure courtroom order.
- Overflow arrangements: Only overflow rooms inside the courthouse offered monitored viewing for journalists and legal observers, not for the general public.
This is standard for major federal cases. Even in high-interest trials, access typically comes through accredited media rather than open public streams.
Public Reaction Across the Country
As the sentencing unfolded, public reaction was immediate. Outside the courthouse, crowds gathered holding signs and recording updates on their phones. Across social media, hashtags related to Diddy’s sentencing trended for hours. Many expressed shock at the length of the sentence, while others felt justice had been served.
Legal experts noted that the sentence reflected a balance between prosecutorial demands and defense arguments. Others pointed out that the case sets an example of how celebrity status doesn’t shield individuals from federal accountability.
How to Follow Future Court Developments
Although the sentencing is complete, the case is expected to continue in the courts through appeals and related civil lawsuits. If you want to follow similar high-profile legal events in the future, here are some tips:
- Check court schedules in advance so you know the date and time of hearings.
- Monitor major news outlets for live coverage plans.
- Use network streaming apps if you don’t have access to cable TV.
- Follow verified legal reporters for accurate, timely updates.
- Look for post-hearing video releases from media outlets for key highlights.
The Key Takeaway
If you were searching for how to watch Diddy sentencing, the answer is clear: major networks, local broadcasts, and live court reporting were the only ways to follow along. There was no direct public livestream from the courtroom itself. This approach is typical in federal cases, where strict rules govern broadcast access.
Diddy’s sentencing marks a significant legal moment, and its coverage shows how media plays a crucial role in keeping the public informed when cameras are not allowed inside.
What are your thoughts on how this case was covered? Share your opinion and join the conversation below.