Former NFL quarterback Joe Theismann is once again at the center of the college football conversation — and his blunt reaction to recent playoff decisions has re-ignited debate nationwide. Theismann, known for his storied career and outspoken commentary, didn’t hold back, using words like “disgusting” and “deplorable” to call out the playoff selection process that excluded his alma mater. The reaction underscores deep questions about fairness, criteria, and the enduring influence of legends on the sport they helped define.
In this article, we break down exactly what Theismann said, why it matters, and how this moment reflects bigger tensions in college football today.
Table of Contents
🔥 Theismann Speaks Out: “Disgusting” Playoff Decision
On a recent appearance with SiriusXM, Theismann expressed his frustration in no uncertain terms over the decision to exclude Notre Dame Fighting Irish from the current College Football Playoff (CFP) field — despite their strong season. He insisted that Notre Dame, along with Miami Hurricanes, should have been included over a three-loss Alabama Crimson Tide squad.
“It was disgusting. It really was,” Theismann said. “Notre Dame and Miami should have been in… what is Alabama doing in this? They’ve lost three games.”
He went on to question how a three-loss team — the first ever admitted to a CFP field — could be selected over teams with better records. To him, the choice didn’t just seem unfair — it was flat wrong.
His remarks quickly became a touchstone among sports fans and analysts alike, setting off renewed debate around whether the CFP’s selection criteria remain credible and transparent.
Why This Matters — And Why People Are Listening
1. A Legend Speaks: Influence Still Strong
Theismann isn’t just any former player. He was a Super Bowl champ, a league MVP, and a beloved broadcaster for decades. His take carries weight — and when he calls a system “disgusting,” people sit up.
For many fans and former players, his reaction validated long-simmering frustrations. When a figure as respected as Theismann questions the legitimacy of a playoff selection, it forces even casual fans to pay attention.
2. Spotlight on the CFP Selection Process
The CFP has always tried to balance a messy set of variables — win-loss records, strength of schedule, head-to-head results, conference championships, and more. But when inclusion of a three-loss team triggers this level of anger, it spotlights the subjective nature of the process.
If top former athletes and analysts publicly call the system a failure, the governing bodies may face renewed pressure to revisit and clarify their criteria.
3. Bigger Implications for College Football’s Future
Theismann also happens to be a proud alumnus of Notre Dame. His outcry embodies a broader sense of discontent among supporters of “independent” or non-conference-aligned programs — those who feel vulnerable to arbitrary selections.
As college football evolves, with shifting conference memberships and increasing playoff scrutiny, this moment may mark a turning point for how fairness and transparency are discussed institutionally.
Theismann’s Broader Role: From Legend to Vocal Critic
For many fans, it’s been decades since Theismann last stepped onto the field. But his presence remains potent. Beyond commentary, he’s actively involved in football culture, media coverage, and even local team developments.
He recently reflected on the planned return of the Washington Commanders to the site of their former home, the legendary RFK Stadium — the venue where Theismann both made his mark and saw his playing career end. He described the move as a nostalgic and meaningful reunion for long-time fans.
Additionally, Theismann has offered bold opinions on draft strategy for the Commanders, even naming specific college prospects he believes could reshape the team’s future. Through these statements, he continues to influence how fans and insiders view team direction — as relevant now as during his playing days.
What This Means for Notre Dame, Alabama — and the CFP
For Notre Dame and Fans
Theismann’s critique sheds fuel on growing fan outrage. If a respected former quarterback calls the selection “deplorable,” many fans may feel emboldened to demand accountability. That pressure could influence future CFP decisions — or at least affect how the committee justifies them.
For Alabama and the Crimson Tide Narrative
Alabama’s inclusion despite three losses — traditionally a major red flag — becomes harder to defend when scrutiny escalates. Public criticism like Theismann’s may prompt calls for stricter standards or even structural reform.
For the CFP System at Large
At minimum, the spotlight might push the CFP to re-evaluate its public messaging, criteria weighting, and transparency. At worst, continued backlash could strain its legitimacy among large segments of the fan base.
Why Theismann’s Voice Still Resonates
It’s easy to fade from memory after retirement. But Theismann avoided that fate. He consistently stayed in the spotlight — not only via broadcasting, but through outspoken takes, media appearances, and public engagements.
He also offers a narrative arc few can match: a small-town kid who defied the odds, climbed to the top, survived a career-ending injury, and reinvented himself. That resilience — and candor — continues to make him a credible voice in the sport.
When he talks about fairness, integrity, and respect for legacy, people listen — and many agree.
What Could Come Next
- Public pressure on the CFP: As criticism mounts, expect fans, former players, and even media analysts to call for clearer playoff selection standards or reforms.
- Potential ripple effects for future seasons: This moment could shape how committees evaluate marginal teams and structure playoff criteria going forward.
- Increased visibility for Notre Dame’s position: With a high-profile advocate like Theismann drawing attention, Notre Dame supporters may gain more influence in future playoff debates.
Joe Theismann’s passionate comments remind us that for many, college football isn’t just a game — it’s legacy, identity, and fairness. Whether you stand with Notre Dame, Alabama, or the CFP committee, few can ignore the weight of his words.
With that in mind, let’s hear from you — what do you think of Theismann’s take? Leave your thoughts in the comments and stay tuned for how this story unfolds.
