As of December 15, 2025, many people across the U.S. are asking about the Trump Derangement Syndrome bill and whether it represents an actual piece of legislation. While the phrase has gained significant attention online, there is no formal bill at the federal or state level officially titled or recognized as such.
The term itself reflects the continuing divide in American politics surrounding former President Donald Trump and has been used primarily as a rhetorical label rather than a legal or legislative one.
Table of Contents
What Is “Trump Derangement Syndrome”?
The expression “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS) emerged in U.S. political discourse during Trump’s first term in office, around 2017. It is used by Trump supporters and some conservative commentators to describe individuals or groups whose criticism of Trump appears, in their view, irrational or overly emotional.
The term gained traction in political commentary, television debates, and social media, often used to highlight what some perceive as unfair treatment of Trump by his opponents and the press.
Over time, the phrase evolved from informal commentary into a partisan talking point. However, it has never been recognized in medical, legal, or academic frameworks and remains purely rhetorical.
Where Did the “Trump Derangement Syndrome Bill” Come From?
The idea of a Trump Derangement Syndrome bill began circulating on social platforms in late 2024, after a Florida state legislator — Rep. Joel Rudman (R-FL) — introduced a non-binding resolution that referenced the term in its text.
This proposal was symbolic and designed to criticize what the legislator described as media bias and political hostility toward Trump supporters. It was not intended to establish legal penalties or medical classifications.
Key points about the resolution:
- Introduced in the Florida House of Representatives as a political commentary, not a law.
- Aimed to “recognize Trump Derangement Syndrome as a significant cause of divisive political behavior.”
- Did not pass into law, nor did it carry enforceable legislative power.
The proposal received widespread online attention, leading many to mistakenly believe that an actual bill had been filed or debated in Congress.
Was There a Federal Trump Derangement Syndrome Bill?
As of December 2025, no such bill exists in Congress. Searches of the U.S. Congressional Record and GovTrack legislative database confirm there are no registered bills or resolutions under this name in either the House of Representatives or the Senate.
The confusion largely comes from social media posts, memes, and satirical commentary that blurred the line between symbolic resolutions and real legislation.
In some cases, political activists have used mock “bills” as part of online campaigns or commentary — a trend that fuels misinformation about the existence of a formal federal law.
The Political Context Behind the Term
The persistence of the term “Trump Derangement Syndrome” reflects the broader cultural and political polarization that continues to shape U.S. politics in 2025.
Even after leaving office in January 2021, Donald Trump has remained a central figure in American political debate. His ongoing presence in media and his potential 2024 campaign kept the term alive in both conservative and liberal circles.
For Trump supporters, the phrase is a shorthand for what they see as persistent bias against their movement. For critics, it’s viewed as a dismissive label used to avoid addressing legitimate political concerns.
This divide underscores how language in modern politics often becomes a weapon — with expressions like “Trump Derangement Syndrome” serving more as cultural markers than factual descriptions.
Impact on Public Discourse
While no law has been enacted around the term, the public discussion about “Trump Derangement Syndrome” continues to influence conversations on:
- Media credibility and bias
- Partisan division in Congress and state legislatures
- Social media narratives about free speech and censorship
- Public trust in government institutions
These discussions highlight how powerful rhetoric can shape national attention — even without formal policy proposals.
Recent Developments Related to the Term
In early 2025, the phrase resurfaced after several conservative commentators and state legislators used it in public speeches and social media posts during debates about press accountability and political polarization.
Notable examples include:
- State-level resolutions in Texas and Florida referencing “Trump Derangement Syndrome” as part of commentary on media coverage and political division.
- Public remarks from commentators on networks such as Fox News and Newsmax describing the term as a “cultural symptom” of ongoing partisan conflict.
However, none of these uses represent legislative bills. They are political statements that reflect continuing ideological tension rather than formal lawmaking.
Fact Check: What Is True About the “Trump Derangement Syndrome Bill”
To clarify the public record as of December 15, 2025:
| Claim | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| A federal Trump Derangement Syndrome bill exists | ❌ False | No such bill has been filed or recognized by Congress. |
| A state-level bill was passed under this name | ❌ False | Only symbolic resolutions have been proposed; none became law. |
| The term originated from medical or scientific literature | ❌ False | It’s a political expression, not a clinical diagnosis. |
| Legislators have used the term in official statements | ✅ True | Used symbolically in state-level commentary or resolutions. |
These facts confirm that the “Trump Derangement Syndrome bill” is a rhetorical concept, not an enacted law or legislative measure.
How Online Misinformation Amplified the Idea
The spread of political misinformation plays a major role in shaping perceptions around terms like this. Posts on platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and Facebook often use exaggerated headlines suggesting a bill was passed to “ban Trump Derangement Syndrome.”
In reality, those posts were based on satirical interpretations of the Florida resolution and partisan commentary, not factual legislative developments.
Fact-checking organizations and political analysts have repeatedly clarified that the so-called “bill” does not exist, emphasizing the importance of verifying legislative information directly from official government sources.
The Broader Takeaway
The story of the so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome bill illustrates how political terminology can evolve into viral myths. While no such legislation exists, the concept continues to appear in public conversations, reflecting ongoing divisions over Trump’s role in American politics.
Whether used sarcastically, critically, or defensively, the phrase serves as a mirror of the emotional intensity that still surrounds the former president’s legacy.
In the end, the “bill” itself may not exist — but the debate it represents remains alive and influential in shaping political rhetoric.
There is no actual Trump Derangement Syndrome bill—only symbolic political references and commentary reflecting America’s ongoing partisan divide.
