A landmark legislative push is underway in Washington, D.C., as a group of Democratic lawmakers formally introduced a bill to more than triple the federal minimum wage — raising it from $7.25 to $25 per hour. Here is everything you need to know about the proposal, who is behind it, how it would work, and what it means for workers and businesses across the country.
Table of Contents
What Is the Living Wage for All Act?
The Living Wage for All Act was formally introduced on April 28, just days before nationwide May Day mobilizations were scheduled to take place. Congressmembers Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), Lateefah Simon (CA-12), and Analilia Mejia (NJ-11) stood alongside labor, civil rights, and economic justice leaders at the U.S. Capitol to unveil the legislation. Supporters describe it as a landmark bill that would raise the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour — the floor they argue working families need to meet the real cost of living in America today.
Why $25? The Data Behind the Number
The $25 figure was not chosen arbitrarily. Advocacy group One Fair Wage, a nonprofit organization that campaigns to end subminimum wages, arrived at the number using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s living wage calculator. That calculator estimates that a single adult living anywhere in the United States needs to earn at least $25 an hour to afford basic essentials — including food, housing, healthcare, and transportation.
The figure also has macroeconomic grounding. The national median wage currently sits at approximately $31 an hour, meaning $25 would represent roughly two-thirds of typical American earnings — a threshold the bill’s sponsors describe as a reasonable and sustainable wage floor.
How Would the Wage Increase Be Phased In?
The bill does not propose an overnight jump. Rather, it establishes a two-track phased approach designed to reflect both the cost of living and the realities of the modern economy.
Large employers — defined as those with 500 or more employees nationwide, or companies with gross annual revenues of $1 billion or more — would be required to bring wages to $25 per hour by 2031. Smaller businesses would have a more gradual timeline, with full compliance required by 2038.
Importantly, the bill also builds in automatic future adjustments. Once $25 is reached, the minimum wage would continue rising in step with typical wages across the broader economy — ensuring that the floor never again falls as far behind as it has over the past 16-plus years.
Subminimum Wages: A Major Change for Tipped and Disabled Workers
One of the bill’s most significant — and most discussed — provisions goes beyond the headline $25 number. The Living Wage for All Act proposes to eliminate all subminimum wages with no exceptions. This includes subminimum wages currently paid to tipped workers, youth workers, and workers with disabilities.
Under existing federal law, tipped workers can legally be paid a cash wage as low as $2.13 per hour, with tips expected to make up the difference. Under the proposed legislation, that cash wage floor would rise to $6 per hour as a starting point. Youth workers and employees with disabilities would similarly see new minimum protections, starting at $6 and $5 per hour respectively, with full convergence to $25 over time.
Why Now? The Affordability Crisis Driving the Push
The federal minimum wage has been frozen at $7.25 per hour since 2009 — making it one of the longest periods of federal wage stagnation in modern American history. Over that same span, the costs of rent, groceries, childcare, and healthcare have climbed significantly, leaving millions of low-wage workers with dramatically reduced purchasing power.
Congresswoman Ramirez has spoken directly to this disconnect, noting that companies are reporting record-high earnings while working people struggle to survive. Congresswoman Mejia echoed this sentiment, stating that housing, gas, and grocery costs have all surged — yet the federal wage floor remains stuck in a very different economic era. Congressman García highlighted the widening gap between corporate profits and the wages of the workers who generate them.
The bill’s introduction also comes at a moment of growing political pressure around affordability, with voters across party lines expressing concern about whether wages are keeping pace with daily living costs.
Where Do States Currently Stand?
The federal proposal comes against a backdrop of significant — and uneven — state-level wage growth. The District of Columbia currently leads the nation with a minimum wage of $17.95 per hour, followed by Washington state at $17.13. Illinois, where two of the bill’s four sponsors are based, recently reached a $15 per hour minimum wage after a multi-year phase-in.
Nineteen states now have minimum wages at or above $15 per hour. However, eighteen states still default to the federal floor of $7.25, and two states technically set their own minimum below that — though federal law requires employers covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act to pay at least $7.25 regardless.
At $25, the proposed federal floor would be higher than any state minimum wage currently in effect anywhere in the country. Momentum is building at local levels too, with $30 proposals advancing in Alameda County and Los Angeles, $27 legislation under debate in Illinois, $30 efforts emerging in New York, and $25 campaigns underway in Washington, D.C., and Maryland.
Who Is Supporting the Bill?
The legislation has drawn broad-based support from organized labor, civil rights organizations, and worker advocacy groups. The bill’s introduction was backed by a coalition of more than 100 labor, community, and social justice organizations operating under the Living Wage for All banner — including One Fair Wage, the NAACP, and the American Federation of Teachers.
SEIU International President April Verrett called the bill a powerful testament to the worker-led movement demanding a new baseline for livable wages, noting that SEIU members across the country are already organizing and pushing for even higher standards. Labor advocates widely characterize the $25 proposal as the national expression of a movement that grew from the Fight for $15 campaign into a broader push for a true living wage.
Critics and Business Opposition
The proposal has not gone without pushback — particularly from the small business community and conservative economic groups. The National Federation of Independent Business has been among the most vocal critics, arguing that previous minimum wage increases have already placed serious strain on employers, especially smaller ones.
Noah Finley, the NFIB’s Illinois state director, stated that many small businesses in his state are still struggling to absorb the $15 per hour minimum wage and warned that a jump to $25 could force difficult decisions around staffing levels, pricing, and even business viability. An NFIB survey of business owners found that a significant share said they would be unable to absorb a rapid increase in mandated labor costs.
Critics more broadly argue that a wage floor more than triple the current level — even phased in over several years — would translate into higher prices for consumers, reduced hours for workers, or business closures, particularly in lower-cost regions of the country where $25 per hour represents a much larger share of typical wages.
What Do Economic Studies Say?
The research on minimum wage increases is nuanced and continues to evolve. On the supportive side, a 2024 joint study from Harvard Kennedy School and the University of California, San Francisco found no significant unintended consequences — such as staffing shortages or reduced worker benefits — following California’s minimum wage increase for fast food workers. Separately, 2024 research from the University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University identified more benefits than drawbacks from wage floor increases, including stronger worker retention and higher revenue at restaurants that raised pay.
On the cautionary side, a 2023 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis found that while large minimum wage increases can produce positive short-term outcomes, the longer-term economic effects are more complex and context-dependent.
Economists broadly agree that the impact of any minimum wage increase depends heavily on the size and speed of the increase, the local cost of living, the industry mix, and whether the phase-in period gives businesses sufficient time to adapt.
Can This Bill Pass?
The legislative path for the Living Wage for All Act is challenging. With Republicans currently in control of both the Senate and the House of Representatives, the bill would need bipartisan support to advance — a significant hurdle given that many GOP lawmakers and business-aligned groups oppose federal wage mandates of this scale.
This is not the first time Congress has attempted to raise the federal minimum wage. Multiple iterations of the Raise the Wage Act have been introduced since 2017 without passing. A minimum wage increase was nearly included in the American Rescue Plan of 2021, but was ultimately stripped from the final package.
That said, political observers note that the conversation around affordability and economic fairness is intensifying across both parties. With cost-of-living concerns proving central to recent election cycles, supporters of the Living Wage for All Act believe momentum — if not an immediate vote — is on their side.
The Bottom Line
The Living Wage for All Act represents the boldest federal minimum wage proposal in U.S. history. At $25 per hour, it would more than triple a wage floor that has not moved since 2009 — a period in which inflation, housing costs, and corporate profits have all risen dramatically. Backed by a growing coalition of labor and civil rights organizations, introduced days ahead of major May Day mobilizations, and championed by four congressmembers with deep roots in working-class communities, the bill signals a clear escalation in the national debate over worker pay and economic fairness.
Whether it becomes law is another question entirely. But the conversation it has launched — and the pressure it places on lawmakers of both parties — is already shaping the wage landscape at the state, local, and federal levels.
