Voters in Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District cast their ballots on December 2, 2025, in a closely watched contest to fill the vacant U.S. House seat previously held by Mark Green. The special election in tennessee drew national attention because of the district’s political history, the competitive polling, and the impact the outcome could have on the narrow balance of power in Congress.
Table of Contents
Why this race matters
The 7th District has long leaned Republican, consistently backing GOP presidential candidates for decades. In the 2024 election, the district supported Donald Trump by more than 20 points. Despite this history, recent polling suggested a competitive matchup between Republican Matt Van Epps and Democrat Aftyn Behn, surprising many political analysts who expected a wider margin.
The stakes extend beyond Tennessee. Because the U.S. House majority is slim, the outcome of this single seat has the potential to affect legislative strategy, party negotiations, and national momentum heading into the 2026 midterm elections.
Campaign focus and national involvement
Both candidates ran aggressive campaigns backed by heavy investment from national groups. Van Epps received prominent support from major Republican figures, who highlighted his focus on security, economic policy, and alignment with party leadership. Behn’s campaign emphasized affordability, healthcare access, and economic stability, themes that resonated with younger voters and suburban residents.
The final weeks of the campaign brought a surge of events, ad spending, and coordinated outreach as each side sought to mobilize supporters. National political committees boosted turnout operations across Middle Tennessee, transforming the contest from a local special election into a nationally monitored test.
Turnout concerns and early voting patterns
Special elections typically see lower voter turnout, and this year followed that pattern. Early voting in the district fell well below levels seen in the 2024 general election. That decline was especially noticeable in historically Republican areas, prompting concerns within the GOP that lower participation could tighten the race.
Turnout trends varied sharply by age. Younger voters showed strong early participation, while older voters — typically a reliable base for Republicans — were more likely to vote on Election Day. These patterns added uncertainty to the final outcome and increased pressure on both campaigns to maximize last-minute mobilization.
Polling and voter trends heading into Election Day
Late November polling showed the race within just a few points. Matt Van Epps held a small advantage, but the margin remained inside typical polling error. When undecided voters were included and leaners were classified, the candidates were separated by only a handful of percentage points.
Voters cited the economy as their top concern, followed by housing affordability and healthcare. Among voters who prioritized economic issues, Van Epps held a slight lead. Behn performed strongly among voters under 40, while Van Epps led significantly among voters over 70 — a dynamic that made turnout among each demographic especially important.
District shifts and national significance
Although the district’s Republican tilt remains strong, this closer-than-usual race has prompted discussion about shifting voter behavior in suburban and mixed urban-rural areas. Even modest gains by Democrats in these communities can transform races once considered noncompetitive.
For national strategists, the Tennessee outcome may serve as an early indicator of how competitive districts will behave in the 2026 midterms. A narrow Republican hold could signal vulnerability, while a Democratic upset would mark a significant strategic shift.
What happens next
Election officials will continue counting and verifying ballots before certifying the final results. County-level data will show where each candidate gained ground and which communities drove turnout. These insights will influence resource decisions and messaging strategies for upcoming races in 2026.
Political observers widely agree that the district’s performance — regardless of the final margin — will inform congressional strategy and reshape expectations for similar districts nationwide.
