Was James Garfield a Good President? Understanding His Short but Powerful Legacy

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Many Americans still wonder, was James Garfield a good president? Though his time in office lasted only a few months, historians today view Garfield’s brief presidency as one filled with potential, principle, and purpose.

Serving as the 20th President of the United States, James Abram Garfield took office in March 1881 and was tragically assassinated that same year. Despite leading for just 200 days, his ideas on government reform, education, and equality continue to shape how scholars view him more than 140 years later.


Who Was James Garfield?

James Garfield was born in 1831 in Orange Township, Ohio, and grew up in poverty. Through determination and education, he worked his way from canal worker to college president, Union general, and finally to president of the United States.

He was known for his intelligence, honesty, and belief that government should serve the people, not political insiders. Before becoming president, Garfield spent nine terms in the U.S. House of Representatives, where he built a reputation as a thoughtful, reform-minded leader.

When he won the presidency in 1880, America was still recovering from the Civil War and struggling with widespread government corruption. Many believed Garfield had the integrity and courage needed to lead the nation into a more honest era.


Garfield’s Presidential Goals and Vision

When historians ask was James Garfield a good president, they often point to his reform agenda. Garfield wanted to create a cleaner, fairer government and focus on education as the foundation of democracy.

His key priorities included:

  • Civil service reform: Ending the corrupt “spoils system,” which handed out government jobs as political rewards.
  • Education for all: Expanding public education, particularly for freed African Americans and working-class Americans.
  • Economic balance: Promoting sound financial policies to strengthen the U.S. economy after the Panic of 1873.
  • National unity: Healing divisions between North and South following the Civil War.

Garfield’s presidency promised renewal. He brought a sense of optimism to Washington, where the public was weary of scandals and political favoritism.


Fighting Corruption: Garfield’s Biggest Battle

One of Garfield’s defining qualities was his courage to stand up to corruption within his own party. At the time, political patronage—known as the “spoils system”—allowed powerful politicians to hand out jobs to their supporters.

Garfield challenged this deeply rooted system, even when it meant clashing with influential figures like Senator Roscoe Conkling of New York, leader of the powerful “Stalwart” faction of the Republican Party.

His insistence on reform angered some political elites but earned him widespread respect from ordinary Americans. Garfield believed government positions should be awarded based on merit, not loyalty—a revolutionary idea for the time.

His work laid the foundation for the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883, passed two years after his death. The act became one of the most important laws in American government, creating a professional, nonpartisan civil service system that still exists today.

Even though Garfield didn’t live to see it happen, the law was a direct result of his efforts and ideals.


Economic and Foreign Policy Views

Garfield’s domestic focus often overshadows his broader vision for America’s future. He supported a stronger economy, fairer trade, and fiscal responsibility. He wanted to reduce federal debt while maintaining a stable currency based on the gold standard.

On foreign affairs, Garfield believed in strengthening ties with Latin America and modernizing the U.S. Navy to protect trade interests. These goals reflected his belief that the United States should grow not just economically, but as a respected force in global politics.

Though his assassination cut these plans short, many historians note that Garfield’s policies foreshadowed the more modern, outward-looking U.S. foreign policy of the late 19th century.


Garfield and Education: A Passion for Learning

One of Garfield’s greatest personal values was education. Having worked his way from poverty to college through sheer determination, he believed that education was the key to freedom and opportunity for all Americans.

Garfield often said, “Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither can be maintained.”

He was especially passionate about improving educational access for freed African Americans after the Civil War. His vision of equality through learning set him apart from many politicians of his time.

If Garfield had lived longer, historians believe he would have championed national education policies similar to those introduced decades later during the Progressive Era.


The Tragedy That Ended His Presidency

Garfield’s presidency ended in tragedy on July 2, 1881, when he was shot by Charles J. Guiteau, a disgruntled office seeker who believed he was owed a government job.

Garfield lingered for nearly 80 days, enduring painful and outdated medical treatment. Despite the best efforts of doctors, poor medical practices—especially the failure to maintain sterile conditions—led to infection.

He died on September 19, 1881, in Elberon, New Jersey. His death shocked the nation and highlighted the dangers of the patronage system he had opposed.

Garfield’s passing deeply moved the country and sparked widespread public demand for reform, which soon resulted in the Pendleton Act—cementing his reform legacy.


Was James Garfield a Good President? Historians’ Perspective

Modern historians generally view Garfield’s presidency positively, even though it was brief. The C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey of 2021 ranked him 23rd out of 44 presidents, showing a gradual rise in his reputation over the years.

He is often praised for his honesty, intellect, and commitment to reform. Many historians believe that if Garfield had served a full term, he might have been one of the most consequential presidents of the late 19th century.

Garfield’s combination of moral leadership and forward-thinking policy made him stand out during a period of political corruption and economic uncertainty. His presidency, though short, symbolized what government could be when led by integrity and vision.


Garfield’s Lasting Legacy

Today, James Garfield is remembered not only for how he died but for what he stood for. His fight against corruption, his dedication to education, and his belief in equal opportunity left a lasting mark on the nation.

The James A. Garfield National Historic Site in Mentor, Ohio, continues to preserve his home and writings, offering visitors insight into his character and ideas.

In the broader story of American leadership, Garfield’s presidency reminds us that greatness isn’t always measured by time in office, but by the values a leader stands for.


In the end, was James Garfield a good president? Most historians would say yes — not because of what he accomplished in his brief tenure, but because of the ideals he represented. Garfield’s vision for honest government and equal opportunity continues to inspire Americans to this day.

Do you believe James Garfield’s short presidency deserves more recognition in U.S. history? Share your thoughts below and join the discussion.

DISCLAIMER: This article is based on verified historical records and expert analysis available as of November 2025.

Advertisement

Recommended Reading

62 Practical Ways Americans Are Making & Saving Money (2026) - A systems-based guide to increasing income and reducing expenses using real-world methods.